PlatformProduct

NetCM

Configuration management you can trust

A configuration management solution that gives visibility into network configuration, highlights inconsistencies in parameter configurations, and lets corrections be made — automated or semi-automated, across RAN, TX, CS-Core, PS-Core, IP-Core and IMS, spanning 2G through 5G in both traditional and virtualized networks.

350k
Network elements — regression-tested scale
~$1.35M
Unused equipment found in one audit
Up to 53%
Golden parameters found out of policy

What we can evidence

Measured
519 boards
≈$1.35M of stranded equipment, one audit

Identify installed-but-unconfigured boards and incorrectly deactivated cells.

One documented audit at a Tier 1 operator running Huawei equipment found 519 WBBP and UBBP boards installed but never configured, roughly $1.35M of equipment sitting unused and reusable to relieve channel-element shortages, plus 353 cells incorrectly deactivated, 986 disabled, and over 3,900 deactivated in total and forgotten in the OSS.

Customer anonymised by region and tier.

Measured
Up to 53%
Golden parameters found out of policy

Measure how far the live network has drifted from your own golden standard.

A list of around 300 golden parameters compared against the live network at a Tier 1 operator found individual parameters up to roughly 53% out of policy.

Measured
350,000
Network elements, regression-tested

Operate at national scale rather than at pilot scale.

Regression-tested to 350,000 network elements. Deployment tiers run from under 20,000 cells, through 20,000–100,000, to 100,000–350,000 cells.

Reported
Up to 30%
CAPEX and OPEX reduction, reported

Reduce configuration-driven CAPEX and OPEX.

Up to 30% CAPEX and OPEX reduction, as reported from a proof of concept at a Latin American operation of a Tier 1 North American operator group covering auto-discovery, multi-vendor golden-standard audits, network-swap dashboards and RAN–Core alignment.

Indicative
$133.6k → $668k
Modelled cumulative saving, years 1–5

Build the business case before committing.

Run for a 2,000,000-subscriber, roughly 3,333-cell example network, the savings model projects cumulative savings of $133,600 in year one rising to $668,000 by year five.

Model output on an example network. Not a measured result from a named deployment — treat as a framework for building your own case.

The problem it solves

NetCM targets the hardest problems in an operator's change-management process: consolidating and gaining visibility over a vast number of network elements and configuration parameters across multiple domains, technologies and vendors; identifying and fixing discrepancies in an ever-expanding parameter set; auto-discovering assets for tracking; and auditing and correcting parameters in bulk. The manual baseline is costly — identifying unconfigured boards by hand means running commands on each NodeB, pulling engineers away from higher-value optimisation work. Misalignment across OEM and domain boundaries, typically planned and operated manually, leads to incorrect configuration and degraded performance.

How it works

A repeatable pipeline built on a centralised database.

  1. Extract, transform, load

    Configuration data from all connected network elements — vendor, domain and technology agnostic — is loaded from multiple sources into a single database.

  2. Digital twin

    The consolidated configuration forms a digital twin of the live network, enabling complex analysis and correlation of REAL (live) versus PLAN (planned) data.

  3. Visualise

    Full network topology view, bulk view and GIS view of the network.

  4. Audit

    Automated audits highlight configuration discrepancies and inconsistencies, eliminating manual audit overhead across domains, vendors and technologies.

  5. Implement

    Discrepancies are corrected through dynamic script generation. With open- and closed-loop generation, the resulting MML, XML, CSV and API calls can be implemented and the response from the NMS or network element relayed back and recorded.

  6. Schedule

    Scripts can be scheduled for future or recurring execution, run ad-hoc, or folded into an existing change-management process.

Capabilities

  • Bulk CM data parsed from network elements; vendor and technology agnostic; multi-domain across RAN, Transport, Core and Datacom.
  • Golden Baseline parameter audit with priority-based policies — a stadium policy can override a city policy for the relevant cells.
  • Closed-loop implementation: OSS script creation, automated corrections, scheduling and notification.
  • Change-management control and full network change history management.
  • New NE licence management and activation; planning and lifecycle management of resources and services.
  • Network inventory and topology discovery; data federation models.
  • Third-party integration via Open API (CSON, Remedy ticketing, Asset, DataHub) on an open automation framework.

Functional modules

Day-to-day tooling includes the Element Browser (parameter values per element), Search and Edit (bulk analysis and optimisation), a GIS module (sites, cells, neighbours and issues such as one-way neighbours or PCI clashes on a map), an Audit module (searchable history of all parameter changes), an Element Comparator, Virtual Groups, a Parameter Manager, and Policy / Policy Manager modules for golden-standard enforcement.

What makes it different

  • Vendor, domain and technology agnostic on a single platform, with integrations cited across Ericsson, Huawei, Nokia, ZTE, Cisco, Aviat, Oracle, Bluecat, SAP and Samsung.
  • A digital twin of the live network enabling cross-domain analysis and correlation of live versus planned data.
  • Open and closed-loop write-back: changes are made to the Plan network and used to update the Real network — direct changes on the live network are not permitted, adding a control layer.
  • Correlation with performance: where NetPM is installed, configuration changes can be correlated with changes in network performance.

Architecture, deployment & scale

Deployable on-site, on virtual servers or in the cloud, on a microservices architecture. Typical architecture uses hardware redundancy (hot-swap/RAID), bonded network cards patched to separate switches, and two clusters — one for the database, one for the web server, with Heartbeat and Pacemaker monitoring so secondaries take over automatically. Collection is via MML, XML, CSV and NetConf over SSH/SFTP, integrating with planning tools, change-request and ticketing systems, optimisation systems and ERP, and exposing an Open API for online CM inventory and data-lake/mediation.

Sizing bandNetwork size
Small< 20,000 cells
Medium20,000 – 100,000 cells
Large100,000 – 350,000 cells

Use cases

  • Change-management process automation for planning and optimisation.
  • Open and closed-loop network write-back automation.
  • Golden baseline parameter auditing and implementation.
  • Network sharing / MOCN / MORAN automation and RAN sharing.
  • Federation of network and planning inventory.
  • Radio, core and transmission optimisation services.
  • Lifecycle management for network devices, licence and feature state management.
  • Network swap management — integration/decommissioning dashboards, RAN–Core alignment, external neighbour audits.
  • Trial and cluster management with change history and bulk parameter changes.
  • GIS use cases — deactivated cells, LAC boundary polygons, regional groupings.

IP address management

IPAM is delivered as a capability within NetCM rather than as a separate product, and that is the point: IP planning and parameter planning share one configuration source of truth instead of drifting apart in two systems. It discovers its own IP inventory directly from the network, holds IPv4 and IPv6 across eight domains under one allocation policy, and makes allocation a governed workflow with approval gates and a full audit trail. It is built on the FlexiPlan low-code framework, so rules and approvals are configured rather than coded. Virgin Media O2 uses the allocation engine in production today.

Full detail on the IP address management use-case page.

Proven in the field

  • Unconfigured boards: at a Tier 1 operator running Huawei equipment, NetCM identified 519 WBBP and UBBP boards installed but never configured, roughly $1.35 million of equipment sitting unused, reusable to relieve channel-element congestion or defer new board spend.
  • Deactivated cells: an audit at a Tier 1 operator (one vendor only) detected 353 cells incorrectly deactivated and 986 disabled, with over 3,900 deactivated in total and forgotten in the OSS.
  • Golden parameters: at a Tier 1 operator, a list of ~300 parameters was compared against the live network, with individual parameters found up to ~53% out of policy.
  • A Tier 1 European operator group runs one of the most extensive deployments — RAN, IMS Core, CS/PS Core, transmission, RAN sharing, 5G standalone core, IP core, XGS-PON and B2B — covering network discovery, bulk change management, baseline policy management, GIS neighbour and polygon management, planning-tool updates, vCore infrastructure management, CMDB updates and orchestration-layer integration.
  • A Latin American operation of a Tier 1 North American operator group ran a proof of concept covering auto-discovery, multi-vendor golden-standard audits, network-swap dashboards, RAN–Core alignment, MOCN checks, open/closed-loop script generation and licence/feature management, with benefits assessed as reaching up to 30% of the operator's current CAPEX and OPEX.
  • A Latin American operator runs an optimisation service on NetCM across a Huawei network, automating optimisation decisions against audited baselines.
  • Additional engagements include integrated planning and configuration management with write-back automation at a large African operator group, network inventory and audit at another large African operator group, and a single-source-of-truth initiative at an Asia-Pacific operator.

Customers anonymised by region and tier. Equipment-value and out-of-policy figures as documented in deployment audits; the 30% CAPEX/OPEX figure is as reported from that proof of concept.

Modelled business case

Digitata Networks maintains an adaptable business-case model covering reduced churn, reduced operating expenditure and delayed investment. Run for a 2,000,000-subscriber, roughly 3,333-cell example network, it projects cumulative savings of $133,600 in year one rising to $668,000 by year five.

These are model outputs for an example network, not measured results from a specific deployment.

Solves

RAN audit

Catch the misconfig before it costs you

Golden-parameter audit & optimisation

One baseline, enforced everywhere — audited daily

Layer-management strategy audit

Keep handover and reselection aligned to the design document

Closed-loop write-back automation

From detection to correction, hands-off

Stranded-capital recovery

Find the equipment you already paid for

RAN sharing

Share infrastructure, split the cost

Change governance & compliance

Prove every change was authorised

Network swap & modernisation

Swap vendors without losing the plot

5G parameter compliance audit

Compliance before KPIs erode

EN-DC / anchor-carrier audit

Every NR cell paired to the right LTE anchor

PCI / RSI conflict scan

Kill the collisions that break handover

Cross-vendor neighbour audit

Audit the seams no single vendor can see

Site acceptance test automation

Replace days of manual OSS work per site

Logical network inventory

Plan the service path, not just the box

Per-site digital twin

Every site, every layer, one screen

Closed-loop incident automation

Alarm storm in, one root-caused ticket out

Change-script pre-flight validation

Catch the bad script before it touches the network

IP address management

One authority for every address, across every domain

Logical Network Planning and Life Cycle Management

Plan, activate and retire logical resources on one model

Service Provisioning for Transport and IP Domains

From resource selection to an approved provisioning output

Data Communication Network Build

Plan the management network before the elements need it

5G Site Build and Provisioning

One governed workflow from 5G site plan to as-built

4G Site Build and Provisioning

Radio, transport and IP planned together, then reconciled

related

proven at

supports vendor

enabled by